A Rare Unity After Charlie Kirk

Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Ben Shapiro, Michael Knowles, and Candace Owens — each has built an independent platform and identity online. (Knowles and Shapiro share a home at The Daily Wire, and Candace was formerly there.) They each have their own voice, their own rhythm, and a distinct take on nearly every political issue. None of them pretend to agree with one another across the board, and in many cases, they go out of their way to make that clear.

Candace, in fact, was pushed out of The Daily Wire over specific comments — proof of how outspoken and uncompromising she can be.

Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

And yet, in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, they’ve done something that’s genuinely worth noting.

They’ve shown restraint, unity, and respect.

No one is trying to outshine the others. No one is using the tragedy to elevate their own platform or position themselves as “the voice” of Charlie’s legacy. They’re not jockeying for influence or trying to capture more of Charlie’s massive audience.

Sure, Candace has spoken more openly about her personal friendship with Charlie — and Megyn perhaps second to her — but neither has done it in a way that diminishes the others. It feels genuine. Simply a reflection of the relationships they actually had with him.

This could’ve been a moment where ego took over, where one or all tried to capitalize on the emotion and attention surrounding Charlie’s death. That’s the world we live in — constant bad-mouthing, self-promotion, and competition for clicks. But that hasn’t happened.

Instead, they’ve amplified each other’s better points. And even if they don’t fully agree behind the scenes (which they almost certainly don’t), they’ve chosen unity over division.

Whether it’s conscious or not, it gives each of them — and the movement as a whole — greater credibility.

These are strong, ambitious, highly visible people. Most have been around for years, some for decades. All could benefit, at least in the short term, from stirring the pot or breaking ranks. But so far, they haven’t.

And that deserves some recognition.

It’s rare to see this kind of consistency — this kind of solidarity — among people who are not part of the same media machine (aside from Shapiro and Knowles). They each have their own platforms, their own goals, and yet they’ve held firm in carrying a consistent message in the face of tragedy.

It’s refreshing to see these voices in harmony. It shows their growing importance and credibility as their platforms continue to rise